Recently Supreme Court declared that live-in relationships are not offensive in any way!
In any way??
How could a responsible judicial system dish out a verdict like this?
I'm not going to take a moral stand on this issue.
I agree, when 2 consenting adults decide to live together without the binding, humdrum legalities of matrimony, it's not an offense.
It's their fundamental right.
But, in the name of fundamental rights, judiciary let out the vicious evil scot free which is extremely offensive to the familial setup we enjoy in India.
Live-in relationships boasts of nothing but lust! Of course lust is a positive, healthy emotion. But Lust comes with a lot of strings..like procreation.
Condoms are NOT foolproof! Accidents happen!
What of the children born out of wedlock?
Dont our so-called Judiciary has any responsibility towards children , the future rulers of this country??!!
After all. by recognizing such live-in relationships, Judiciary is stomping unconcernedly on such children's fundamental Rights!
Children have no fundamental rights?
Western world has so many good things to ape ! But why we always hellbent on aping the worst from them? Just by watching them, we all know what happens when giving
in to the popular term 'fundamental rights'! Single mothers, foster homes, ever increasing Juvenile homes, resulting in more heinous crimes.
It's influence on one's emotional equilibrium is more dangerous and disastrous. Thus developed the western society which is full of bitter, cynical,
emotionally robbed off, extremely lonely people!
Do we want that here in India?
Live-in relationships are nothing but Lust of convenience! Those who don't trust each other, who are commitment-shy, who hate responsibilities, who lack mutual respect
indulge in such relationships. If this is what live-in relationships offer, is it advisable to advocate it? It's definitely, undoubtedly anti-social!
Indulge in lust as much as u want! There ends that couple's so-called Fundamental Rights! Coming out of ur house, voicing ur anti social thoughts is crime..cz it
influence many innocent, uncorrupted young minds. It's a known fact that bad things attract!
Fundamental rights are alright..only when practiced in good causes. Exploiting it at every given opportunity and Judiciary joining hands with such attitude is highly worrying!
After all. Judiciary is not only responsible for keeping the constitutional rights. It has social responsibilities too!
If judiciary is going to act like "we act according to law and within law '..then they better stay out of such socially affecting, grossly misleading verdicts.
The pathetic thing is..the Judge quoted from Hindu mythology 'Krishna and Radha' to support his verdict.
If so..polygamy should also be acceptable..should be considered as fundamental rights!
A woman can have 5+1 husbands!
All brothers can marry the same woman!
Being a Playboy like Krishna is laudable!
Wooing and lusting after another man's wife [Radha]is not a crime!
Infidelity [Radha] attains god-like status!
All the above mythological deeds are..by far and above..comes under fundamental rights.
But..if we apply it in our real life in the name fundamental rights..it's a sure, potent cocktail
for total destruction of our civlised, social set up.
Humans are polygamous by nature. But civilization demands certain discipline. If procreation is not involved in this issue, Live-in relationships are not going to cause that much problem
with societal setup.
In any way??
How could a responsible judicial system dish out a verdict like this?
I'm not going to take a moral stand on this issue.
I agree, when 2 consenting adults decide to live together without the binding, humdrum legalities of matrimony, it's not an offense.
It's their fundamental right.
But, in the name of fundamental rights, judiciary let out the vicious evil scot free which is extremely offensive to the familial setup we enjoy in India.
Live-in relationships boasts of nothing but lust! Of course lust is a positive, healthy emotion. But Lust comes with a lot of strings..like procreation.
Condoms are NOT foolproof! Accidents happen!
What of the children born out of wedlock?
Dont our so-called Judiciary has any responsibility towards children , the future rulers of this country??!!
After all. by recognizing such live-in relationships, Judiciary is stomping unconcernedly on such children's fundamental Rights!
Children have no fundamental rights?
Western world has so many good things to ape ! But why we always hellbent on aping the worst from them? Just by watching them, we all know what happens when giving
in to the popular term 'fundamental rights'! Single mothers, foster homes, ever increasing Juvenile homes, resulting in more heinous crimes.
It's influence on one's emotional equilibrium is more dangerous and disastrous. Thus developed the western society which is full of bitter, cynical,
emotionally robbed off, extremely lonely people!
Do we want that here in India?
Live-in relationships are nothing but Lust of convenience! Those who don't trust each other, who are commitment-shy, who hate responsibilities, who lack mutual respect
indulge in such relationships. If this is what live-in relationships offer, is it advisable to advocate it? It's definitely, undoubtedly anti-social!
Indulge in lust as much as u want! There ends that couple's so-called Fundamental Rights! Coming out of ur house, voicing ur anti social thoughts is crime..cz it
influence many innocent, uncorrupted young minds. It's a known fact that bad things attract!
Fundamental rights are alright..only when practiced in good causes. Exploiting it at every given opportunity and Judiciary joining hands with such attitude is highly worrying!
After all. Judiciary is not only responsible for keeping the constitutional rights. It has social responsibilities too!
If judiciary is going to act like "we act according to law and within law '..then they better stay out of such socially affecting, grossly misleading verdicts.
The pathetic thing is..the Judge quoted from Hindu mythology 'Krishna and Radha' to support his verdict.
If so..polygamy should also be acceptable..should be considered as fundamental rights!
A woman can have 5+1 husbands!
All brothers can marry the same woman!
Being a Playboy like Krishna is laudable!
Wooing and lusting after another man's wife [Radha]is not a crime!
Infidelity [Radha] attains god-like status!
All the above mythological deeds are..by far and above..comes under fundamental rights.
But..if we apply it in our real life in the name fundamental rights..it's a sure, potent cocktail
for total destruction of our civlised, social set up.
Humans are polygamous by nature. But civilization demands certain discipline. If procreation is not involved in this issue, Live-in relationships are not going to cause that much problem
with societal setup.
Posts
